conversation is an engine

A lot can happen in a conversation

When Hoax-Busters Give Up

with one comment

And so we descend into irrationality

Our Bright Shining Future

Our Bright Shining Future

The end of the Washington Post’s “What was Fake” column had the writer quoting academic Walter Quattrociocchi, head of the Laboratory of Computational Social Science at IMT Lucca in Italy:

Essentially, he explained, institutional distrust is so high right now, and cognitive bias so strong always, that the people who fall for hoax news stories are frequently only interested in consuming information that conforms with their views — even when it’s demonstrably fake.

The entire last article is worth reading: What was fake on the Internet this week: Why this is the final column.

To sum up this moment: we read what agrees with our viewpoint, we talk with people in our tribe who agree with us, we label those who disagree with us and we generally see facts as “facts.”

This moment does not represent the future I hoped for.


Image credit: Kirk Livingston

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Irrational doesn’t even begin to cover it. Plus, so mean-spirited. (K)


    December 19, 2015 at 9:05 pm

But wait--what do you think? Tell me:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: